社论概念插图设计提示词系统

2x2 grid, AI infers topics, 16:9 CLASSIFY(input) → { domain: editorial_illustration × conceptual_art × political_commentary intent: persuade + provoke + distill (the "unforgettable glance") audience: op-ed readers, magazine subscribers, visual intellectuals platform: print (magazine cover, editorial header), scalable to 4cm thumbnail complexity: extreme (requires strict metaphor singularity, physical print simulation, and absolute rejection of literalism and digital rendering) } CORE DESIGN LAWS (IMMUTABLE): ⚠ ONE METAPHOR. ONE SUBSTITUTION. ZERO TEXT. • Substitution: Change Scale XOR Material XOR Function. Never two. • Restraint: No text, no arrows, no forehead symbols. Ambiguity ≠ Confusion. • Treatment: 3-4 flat colors, 1 texture, shape-first, generic faces. • Medium: Physical print character (Riso, screenprint, litho). • Survival: Must read perfectly at 4cm wide. SEMANTIC_VARIABLES (AI infers entirely from {{THESIS}}): {{THESIS}} → [USER PLUGS IN: e.g., "Tech monopolies are extracting behavioral data like 19th-century colonial rubber barons."] {{BENEFICIARY}} → AI infers the winner (e.g., The Algorithm / The Corporation) {{VICTIM}} → AI infers the loser (e.g., The User / The Public) {{TENSION}} → AI infers the core conflict (e.g., Extraction vs. Autonomy) {{FAMILIAR_SCENE}} → AI infers the baseline visual (e.g., A Victorian rubber plantation) {{SUBSTITUTION}} → AI selects exactly ONE wrong element (Scale, Material, OR Function) {{PALETTE}} → 3-4 flat colors inferred from the tension {{TEXTURE}} → The single print artifact (Riso grain, screenprint halftone)